Tuesday 8 November 2011

TTEC4842- AUTOMOTIVE ENGINES (ENGINE SHORT BLOCK)

                           TTEC4842- AUTOMOTIVE ENGINES 
                        
                             ENGINE SHORT BLOCK    


                                      





(Enigne short block)

Firstly I, started taking everything apart from the block pistons, conrods, crankshaft,etc and opened the block.


INSPECTION OF PISTONS:
There was no piston damage to 4 pistons but the one thing ws, the piston 2,3,4 were missing there middle rings.



 1
 2
 3
 4
 piston
 78mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 ok/fail
 ok
 ok
 ok
 ok

This showed me that the pistons were all ok within the specs ., and dont need any replacement.


Inspection of cylinder bore:

During the inspection of the bore, I found there were no damages on it ,but there were few scuffs on all.

Then moved on by measuring the bores with a bore gauge at two positions top & bottem.

Cylinder bore measurement:



 cylineder 1
 cylinder2
 cylinder 3
 cylinder 4

1
 first measurement ( direction x)
 78.01 mm
78.01mm 
 78.01mm
78.01mm 
 first measurement ( direction y)
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm







3
 third measurement (x)
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 third measurement (y)
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 amount of taper
 0.0mm
 0.0mm
 0.00mm
 0.00mm
 amount of ovality
 0.0mm
0.00mm 
 0.0mm
 0.0mm
 ok/fail
 ok
 ok
 ok
 ok


 This showed me that the cylinder bore measurement meet the specifications.



Piston clearance:



 cylinder 1
 cylinder 2
 cylinder 3
 cylinder 4
 (a)
 largest boren diameter
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 78.01mm
 (b)
 pistoon skirt diameter
 78.00mm
78.01mm 
 78.01mm
 78.01mm

 piston to cylinder clearance(a-b)
 0.01mm
 0mm
 0.0mm
 0.0mm

 ok/fail
 ok
 ok
 ok
 ok



 This showed me that all four pistons were in the manufacturing specifications.

Piston and rings:
Firstly I,did a visual check on the piston rings for any sign of damage, wear or breakage,.
four of the rings were in good condition, have 3 pistons missing middle rings.
Checking piston ring side clearance :


Then moved on by checking the clearance of the piston rings using a feeler gauge between the ring and the ring groove.



                                      Ring side clearance
 specification  0.030mm-0.065mm
 1
 0.038mm ok
 2
 0.038mm ok
 3
 0.038mm ok
 4
 0.038mm ok


 This showed us that the rings clearance is good and it meet the specification. if the rings have any excessive side clearance. if by if the lands wear our or the rings wear out aswell.

Checking piston ring end gap:
Here I,push the ring down the bore, using the piston to keep it square, until the ring is in the least worn part of the bore. then i checked the ring end gap with a feeler gauge.



 top ring end clearance

 specification  0.15mm  - 0.30mm
 cylinder 1
 0.33mm  ok
 cylinder 2
 0.33mm  ok
 cylinder 3
 0.33mm  ok
 cylinder 4
 0.33mm  ok



The pistons rings didnt require any replacement and they were in the manufactring specifications, CYL4 ring is slightly more then spec but doesnt matter.
Inspecting connecting rods:

first thing was is to inspect the rods for any bend twist or any misaligment. i checked my rods is by using the tool called hydrulic rod straightening press.


 bend
 twist

 1
 0.813mm
0.885mm 

 2
 0.0385mm
 0.885mm

 3
 0.385mm
 0.254mm








In this task we couldnt use our rods we used different rods and couldnt get the manufacturing specifications.

Inspecting the crankshaft:
main journal specification
diameter = 49.938-49.956mm
taper limit = 0.05mm
ovality= 0.05mm

In this task was to measure the main journal using a micrometer to check for (A) which is across and (B) down.




 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 diamater A1
49.45mm
49.44mm
49.45mm
49.44mm
49.44mm
 diameter B1
49.44mm
49.44mm
49.44mm
49.43mm
49.48mm
 diameter A2
49.46mm
49.44mm
49.44mm
49.44mm
49.49mm
 diameter B2
49.44mm
49.44mm
49.44mm
49.44mm
49.49mm
 ovality
A minus B
0.01mm
0.0mm
0.0mm
0.01mm
0.00mm
 largest diameter
 A1 or B1

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1,B1
 smallest diameter
A2 or B2

B2

A2

B2

B2

A2
 taper
 A1 minus A2

0.01mm

0.00mm

0.00mm

0.00mm

0.01mm
 STD diameter

49.45mm

49.46mm

49.496mm

49.49mm

49.49mm
 smallest diameter (from A or B )

49.44mm

49.44mm

49.44m

49.43mm

49.48mm
 wear
0.01
0.02mm
0.00mm

0.01mm
0.01mm
The undersize was 0.50mm that mean main journals were in the manufactring specification.




Big end journals:

big end journal specification

diameter = 39.94mm
taper limit = 39.94mm
ovality= 39.94mm



 1
 2
 3
 4
 diameter A1
40.70mm
40.70mm
40.70mm
47.70mm
 diameter B1
40.94mm
4.94mm
40.93mm
40.94mm
 diameter A2
40.93mm
40.94mm
40.94mm
40.93mm
 diameter B2
40.94mm
40.94mm
40.94mm
40.93mm
 ovality
A minus B
0.24mm
0.24mm
0.23mm
0.24mm
 largest diameter
 A1 or B1

B1

B1

B1

B1
 smallest diameter
A2 or B2

A2

A2

B1

B1
 taper
 A1 minus A2

0.24mm

0.24mm

0.23mm

0.24mm
 STD diameter
39.94mm
39.94mm
39.94mm
39.94mm
 smallest diameter (from A or B )

40.93mm

40.94mm

40.93mm

40.94mm
 wear
0.99mm
1mm
0.99mm

1mm


 This was a havey duty crank shaft , and the undersize 0.50mm this was in good condition and meet the specifications.


Inspecting the crankshaft:
crankshaft deflection specification. Runout 0.04mm.
Here I, put the crankshaft on the 'v' block to measure the crankshaft deflection. which i measured by using a dial test indicator (DTI)
The run out was 0.03mm there was distortion within specs..

Inspecting the cylinder block:
I,did a visual check on the block there was minear scuffS, REST ALL WAS GOOD.

The moved on by measuring the cylinder block face distortion in six places.

Block face distortion specification  :- 0.015mm
6 of the test on the block face distortion WERE AS FOLLOW:-
  1. 0.038mm
  2. 0.038mm
  3. 0.038mm
  4. 0mm
  5. 0mm
  6. 0mm
So, everything was within specs.
Inspection of timing gears, sprockets,chains,and belts.
1. Camshaft gears or sprockets= there was no damage or wear on the camshaft. ALL GOOD
2. Crank gear or sprockets= it was clean no wear , BUT THE CHIP ON CRANK GEAR BROKEN SO REPLACE IT
3. Idler gears or sprockets=  Rust on idler so replace it.
THE BELT IS WARN , SO NEED TO REPACE IT.
Inspect water pump:
EVERYTHING GOOD IN CONDION ,THEN BLADES HAVE RUST ON THEM.
Inspecting oil pump:
The type of oil pump i was working on was a rotory pump. i did a visual check, the rotor pump looks in good condition no damage or any signs of scuffing.
checking clearance

 specification
 actual
 SIDE CLEARANCE
 0.025-0.075mm
 .0051mm
 ROTOR TIP CLEARANCE
 0.060-0.180mm
 .089mm
OUTER ROTOR CLEARANCE
 0.080-0.180mm
 .125mm





The oil pump is in good condition and its serviceable.

checking main bearing oil clearance:
first thing i did was placed a strip of plasti-gauge across each main journal


Main bearing clearanceThen i installed the bearing and caps to torque specification 54-59 mm
Then i removed the caps and bearing and measured the widest part of the plasti-gauge


 specification 0.024-0.042mm


 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 oil clearance (actual)
 0.025mm
 0.025mm
 0.025mm
 0.038mm
 0.038mm
 ok/fail
 ok
 ok
 ok
ok 
 ok





The oil clearance were in the specifications.
 checking crankshaft end play, using The (DTI) ; fIRSTLY  I, set the gauege to Zero and i pulled the crankshaft towards the DTI and i had reading of  0.2 there end play on the crankshaft but within specs.
checking crankshaft end play using the feeler gauge:
specifications'0.08-0.242
End play 0.09
This showed that the crankshaft is in good condition and meet the specification

checking the big end bearing clearance
i used the same meathod for the main bearing by using a plasti-gauge across the connecting rod journal.

specification 0.028-0.050mm


 1
 2
 3
 4

 oil clearance (actual)
 0.050mm
 0.050mm
 0.50mm
 0.050mm

 ok/fail
 ok
 ok
 ok
ok 



the big end bearing clearance also meet within the specification. i ensured that the crankshaft also should turn freely before doing the measurments.

checking the connection rod end play, using a feeler gauge.

specification -0.30mm


 1
 2
 3
 4

 con-rod-endplay (actual)
 0.28mm
 0.28mm
 0.28mm
0.28mm

 ok/fail
 ok
ok
 ok
ok




WITHIN SPECS SO NO CHANGE NEEDED HERE.

IN LAST I,WILL LIKE TO SAY THAT THE BLOCK I WAS WORIKNG WITH WAS A HEAVY DUTY DUTY BLOCK THERE WAS NO DAMAGE ON THE PISTON BUT WERE MISSNG FEW MIDDLE RINGS, THE RODS WERE NICE AND STRAIGHT. THERE WERE FEW BOLTS MISSING ON THE ENGINE BEFORE I STARTED WORKING.











No comments:

Post a Comment