TTEC4842- AUTOMOTIVE ENGINES
ENGINE SHORT BLOCK
This showed me that the cylinder bore measurement meet the specifications.
big end journal specification
Inspecting the cylinder block:
the big end bearing clearance also meet within the specification. i ensured that the crankshaft also should turn freely before doing the measurments.
checking the connection rod end play, using a feeler gauge.
WITHIN SPECS SO NO CHANGE NEEDED HERE.
ENGINE SHORT BLOCK
(Enigne short block)
Firstly I, started taking everything apart from the block pistons, conrods, crankshaft,etc and opened the block.
INSPECTION OF PISTONS:
There was no piston damage to 4 pistons but the one thing ws, the piston 2,3,4 were missing there middle rings.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
piston | 78mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm |
ok/fail | ok | ok | ok | ok |
This showed me that the pistons were all ok within the specs ., and dont need any replacement.
Inspection of cylinder bore:
During the inspection of the bore, I found there were no damages on it ,but there were few scuffs on all.
Then moved on by measuring the bores with a bore gauge at two positions top & bottem.
Cylinder bore measurement:
cylineder 1 | cylinder2 | cylinder 3 | cylinder 4 | ||
1 | first measurement ( direction x) | 78.01 mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm |
first measurement ( direction y) | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | |
3 | third measurement (x) | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm |
third measurement (y) | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | |
amount of taper | 0.0mm | 0.0mm | 0.00mm | 0.00mm | |
amount of ovality | 0.0mm | 0.00mm | 0.0mm | 0.0mm | |
ok/fail | ok | ok | ok | ok |
This showed me that the cylinder bore measurement meet the specifications.
Piston clearance:
The pistons rings didnt require any replacement and they were in the manufactring specifications, CYL4 ring is slightly more then spec but doesnt matter.
Inspecting connecting rods:
The undersize was 0.50mm that mean main journals were in the manufactring specification.
cylinder 1 | cylinder 2 | cylinder 3 | cylinder 4 | |||
(a) | largest boren diameter | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | |
(b) | pistoon skirt diameter | 78.00mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | 78.01mm | |
piston to cylinder clearance(a-b) | 0.01mm | 0mm | 0.0mm | 0.0mm | ||
ok/fail | ok | ok | ok | ok | ||
This showed me that all four pistons were in the manufacturing specifications.
Piston and rings:
Checking piston ring side clearance :Firstly I,did a visual check on the piston rings for any sign of damage, wear or breakage,.
four of the rings were in good condition, have 3 pistons missing middle rings.
Then moved on by checking the clearance of the piston rings using a feeler gauge between the ring and the ring groove.
Ring side clearance | |
specification 0.030mm-0.065mm | |
1 | 0.038mm ok |
2 | 0.038mm ok |
3 | 0.038mm ok |
4 | 0.038mm ok |
This showed us that the rings clearance is good and it meet the specification. if the rings have any excessive side clearance. if by if the lands wear our or the rings wear out aswell.
Checking piston ring end gap:
Here I,push the ring down the bore, using the piston to keep it square, until the ring is in the least worn part of the bore. then i checked the ring end gap with a feeler gauge.
top ring end clearance | |
specification 0.15mm - 0.30mm | |
cylinder 1 | 0.33mm ok |
cylinder 2 | 0.33mm ok |
cylinder 3 | 0.33mm ok |
cylinder 4 | 0.33mm ok |
Inspecting connecting rods:
first thing was is to inspect the rods for any bend twist or any misaligment. i checked my rods is by using the tool called hydrulic rod straightening press.
bend | twist | ||
1 | 0.813mm | 0.885mm | |
2 | 0.0385mm | 0.885mm | |
3 | 0.385mm | 0.254mm | |
In this task we couldnt use our rods we used different rods and couldnt get the manufacturing specifications.
Inspecting the crankshaft:
main journal specification
main journal specification
diameter = 49.938-49.956mm
taper limit = 0.05mm
ovality= 0.05mm
In this task was to measure the main journal using a micrometer to check for (A) which is across and (B) down.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
diamater A1 | 49.45mm | 49.44mm | 49.45mm | 49.44mm | 49.44mm | |
diameter B1 | 49.44mm | 49.44mm | 49.44mm | 49.43mm | 49.48mm | |
diameter A2 | 49.46mm | 49.44mm | 49.44mm | 49.44mm | 49.49mm | |
diameter B2 | 49.44mm | 49.44mm | 49.44mm | 49.44mm | 49.49mm | |
ovality A minus B | 0.01mm | 0.0mm | 0.0mm | 0.01mm | 0.00mm | |
largest diameter A1 or B1 | A1 | A1 | A1 | A1 | A1,B1 | |
smallest diameter A2 or B2 | B2 | A2 | B2 | B2 | A2 | |
taper A1 minus A2 | 0.01mm | 0.00mm | 0.00mm | 0.00mm | 0.01mm | |
STD diameter | 49.45mm | 49.46mm | 49.496mm | 49.49mm | 49.49mm | |
smallest diameter (from A or B ) | 49.44mm | 49.44mm | 49.44m | 49.43mm | 49.48mm | |
wear | 0.01 | 0.02mm | 0.00mm | 0.01mm | 0.01mm | |
Big end journals:
big end journal specification
diameter = 39.94mm
taper limit = 39.94mm
ovality= 39.94mm
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
diameter A1 | 40.70mm | 40.70mm | 40.70mm | 47.70mm | ||
diameter B1 | 40.94mm | 4.94mm | 40.93mm | 40.94mm | ||
diameter A2 | 40.93mm | 40.94mm | 40.94mm | 40.93mm | ||
diameter B2 | 40.94mm | 40.94mm | 40.94mm | 40.93mm | ||
ovality A minus B | 0.24mm | 0.24mm | 0.23mm | 0.24mm | ||
largest diameter A1 or B1 | B1 | B1 | B1 | B1 | ||
smallest diameter A2 or B2 | A2 | A2 | B1 | B1 | ||
taper A1 minus A2 | 0.24mm | 0.24mm | 0.23mm | 0.24mm | ||
STD diameter | 39.94mm | 39.94mm | 39.94mm | 39.94mm | ||
smallest diameter (from A or B ) | 40.93mm | 40.94mm | 40.93mm | 40.94mm | ||
wear | 0.99mm | 1mm | 0.99mm | 1mm | ||
This was a havey duty crank shaft , and the undersize 0.50mm this was in good condition and meet the specifications.
Inspecting the crankshaft:
crankshaft deflection specification. Runout 0.04mm.
Here I, put the crankshaft on the 'v' block to measure the crankshaft deflection. which i measured by using a dial test indicator (DTI)
The run out was 0.03mm there was distortion within specs..
Inspecting the cylinder block:
I,did a visual check on the block there was minear scuffS, REST ALL WAS GOOD.
The moved on by measuring the cylinder block face distortion in six places.
Block face distortion specification :- 0.015mm
The moved on by measuring the cylinder block face distortion in six places.
Block face distortion specification :- 0.015mm
6 of the test on the block face distortion WERE AS FOLLOW:-
- 0.038mm
- 0.038mm
- 0.038mm
- 0mm
- 0mm
- 0mm
Inspection of timing gears, sprockets,chains,and belts.
1. Camshaft gears or sprockets= there was no damage or wear on the camshaft. ALL GOOD
2. Crank gear or sprockets= it was clean no wear , BUT THE CHIP ON CRANK GEAR BROKEN SO REPLACE IT
3. Idler gears or sprockets= Rust on idler so replace it.
THE BELT IS WARN , SO NEED TO REPACE IT.
Inspect water pump:
EVERYTHING GOOD IN CONDION ,THEN BLADES HAVE RUST ON THEM.
Inspecting oil pump:
The type of oil pump i was working on was a rotory pump. i did a visual check, the rotor pump looks in good condition no damage or any signs of scuffing.
checking clearance
specification | actual | |
SIDE CLEARANCE | 0.025-0.075mm | .0051mm |
ROTOR TIP CLEARANCE | 0.060-0.180mm | .089mm |
OUTER ROTOR CLEARANCE | 0.080-0.180mm | .125mm |
The oil pump is in good condition and its serviceable.
checking main bearing oil clearance:
first thing i did was placed a strip of plasti-gauge across each main journal
Main bearing clearanceThen i installed the bearing and caps to torque specification 54-59 mm
Then i removed the caps and bearing and measured the widest part of the plasti-gauge
The oil clearance were in the specifications.
Main bearing clearanceThen i installed the bearing and caps to torque specification 54-59 mm
Then i removed the caps and bearing and measured the widest part of the plasti-gauge
specification 0.024-0.042mm | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
oil clearance (actual) | 0.025mm | 0.025mm | 0.025mm | 0.038mm | 0.038mm |
ok/fail | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
The oil clearance were in the specifications.
checking crankshaft end play, using The (DTI) ; fIRSTLY I, set the gauege to Zero and i pulled the crankshaft towards the DTI and i had reading of 0.2 there end play on the crankshaft but within specs.
checking crankshaft end play using the feeler gauge:
specifications'0.08-0.242
End play 0.09
specifications'0.08-0.242
End play 0.09
This showed that the crankshaft is in good condition and meet the specification
checking the big end bearing clearance
checking the big end bearing clearance
i used the same meathod for the main bearing by using a plasti-gauge across the connecting rod journal.
specification 0.028-0.050mm | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
oil clearance (actual) | 0.050mm | 0.050mm | 0.50mm | 0.050mm | |
ok/fail | ok | ok | ok | ok |
the big end bearing clearance also meet within the specification. i ensured that the crankshaft also should turn freely before doing the measurments.
checking the connection rod end play, using a feeler gauge.
specification -0.30mm | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
con-rod-endplay (actual) | 0.28mm | 0.28mm | 0.28mm | 0.28mm | |
ok/fail | ok | ok | ok | ok |
WITHIN SPECS SO NO CHANGE NEEDED HERE.
IN LAST I,WILL LIKE TO SAY THAT THE BLOCK I WAS WORIKNG WITH WAS A HEAVY DUTY DUTY BLOCK THERE WAS NO DAMAGE ON THE PISTON BUT WERE MISSNG FEW MIDDLE RINGS, THE RODS WERE NICE AND STRAIGHT. THERE WERE FEW BOLTS MISSING ON THE ENGINE BEFORE I STARTED WORKING.